Appellate Division, Second Department · January 14, 2026 · 252 AD3d 1
People v Nymeen C.
Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 1
Holding An order dismissing an application for resentencing pursuant to the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act without prejudice is appealable as of right because it constitutes an order denying resentencing. The court affirmed the dismissal because the defendant failed to provide evidence corroborating that she was a victim of domestic violence at the specific time of the offense.
The court’s words
an order ‘‘dismiss[ing]’’ an application for resentencing pursuant to the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act (DVSJA) ‘‘without prejudice’’ pursuant to CPL 440.47 (2) (d) is appealable
252 AD3d 1, at the official text
the effect of an order ‘‘dismissing’’ a resentencing application is that the defendant has been denied resentencing
252 AD3d 1, at the official text
the defendant failed to submit any evidence ‘‘corroborating [her] claim that . . . she was, at the time of the offense, a victim of domestic violence subjected to substantial physical, sexual or psychological abuse inflicted by a member of the same family or household’’
252 AD3d 1, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | January 14, 2026 |
| Citation | 252 AD3d 1 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending January 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 252 AD3d 1 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv38.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 101 |
| Caption in the source feed | PEOPLE v NYMEEN C. |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Nymeen C., 252 AD3d 1 (Appellate Division, Second Department, January 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-1/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works