ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · January 14, 2026 · 252 AD3d 1

People v Nymeen C.

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 1

Holding An order dismissing an application for resentencing pursuant to the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act without prejudice is appealable as of right because it constitutes an order denying resentencing. The court affirmed the dismissal because the defendant failed to provide evidence corroborating that she was a victim of domestic violence at the specific time of the offense.

The court’s words

an order ‘‘dismiss[ing]’’ an application for resentencing pursuant to the Domestic Violence Survivors Justice Act (DVSJA) ‘‘without prejudice’’ pursuant to CPL 440.47 (2) (d) is appealable

252 AD3d 1, at the official text

the effect of an order ‘‘dismissing’’ a resentencing application is that the defendant has been denied resentencing

252 AD3d 1, at the official text

the defendant failed to submit any evidence ‘‘corroborating [her] claim that . . . she was, at the time of the offense, a victim of domestic violence subjected to substantial physical, sexual or psychological abuse inflicted by a member of the same family or household’’

252 AD3d 1, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedJanuary 14, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 1
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending January 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 1
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv38.pdf
Law Watch record id101
Caption in the source feedPEOPLE v NYMEEN C.

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Nymeen C., 252 AD3d 1 (Appellate Division, Second Department, January 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-1/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published January 14, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.