Appellate Division, First Department · March 24, 2026 · 252 AD3d 102
Matter of Lubenesky
Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 102
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Holding The court granted the Attorney Grievance Committee’s motion for reciprocal discipline, publicly censuring the respondent for failing to comply with record-keeping requirements and promptly returning client funds. The court deferred to the sanction imposed by the New Jersey Disciplinary Board, finding that public censure was commensurate with the discipline imposed in the foreign jurisdiction.
The court’s words
public censure, as requested by the AGC, is the appropriate sanction here as it is commensurate with the discipline imposed in New Jersey
252 AD3d 102, at the official text
this Court defers to the sanction imposed by the jurisdiction in which the charges were originally brought because the foreign jurisdiction has the greatest interest in fashioning sanctions for misconduct
252 AD3d 102, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | March 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 252 AD3d 102 |
| Area of law | Attorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility |
| Week | Week ending March 28, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 252 AD3d 102 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv40.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1131 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Lubenesky, 252 AD3d 102 (Appellate Division, First Department, March 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-102/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works