ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · March 24, 2026 · 252 AD3d 102

Matter of Lubenesky

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 102

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The court granted the Attorney Grievance Committee’s motion for reciprocal discipline, publicly censuring the respondent for failing to comply with record-keeping requirements and promptly returning client funds. The court deferred to the sanction imposed by the New Jersey Disciplinary Board, finding that public censure was commensurate with the discipline imposed in the foreign jurisdiction.

The court’s words

public censure, as requested by the AGC, is the appropriate sanction here as it is commensurate with the discipline imposed in New Jersey

252 AD3d 102, at the official text

this Court defers to the sanction imposed by the jurisdiction in which the charges were originally brought because the foreign jurisdiction has the greatest interest in fashioning sanctions for misconduct

252 AD3d 102, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedMarch 24, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 102
Area of lawAttorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility
WeekWeek ending March 28, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 102
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv40.pdf
Law Watch record id1131

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Lubenesky, 252 AD3d 102 (Appellate Division, First Department, March 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-102/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published March 24, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.