ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · February 26, 2026 · 252 AD3d 154

Frasier v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 154

Holding The court reversed the lower court’s stay and referral to the Public Service Commission, holding that the primary jurisdiction doctrine did not apply because the claims were common-law torts requiring judicial determination of duty and causation. The PSC’s regulatory standards set only a minimum safety floor and do not dispositive the specific duty of care regarding stray voltage’s impact on cattle.

The court’s words

compliance with regulatory standards is not dispositive as to due care

252 AD3d 154, at the official text

the duty of care with respect to stray voltage on dairy farms may be quite different from this regulatory floor

252 AD3d 154, at the official text

resolution of plaintiffs’ claims do not first require resolution of issues placed within the agency’s special competence

252 AD3d 154, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedFebruary 26, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 154
Area of lawAdministrative Law · Personal Injury and Negligence
WeekWeek ending February 28, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 154
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv41.pdf
Law Watch record id1312

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Frasier v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 252 AD3d 154 (Appellate Division, Third Department, February 26, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-154/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published February 26, 2026. Updated February 26, 2026.