Appellate Division, Third Department · February 26, 2026 · 252 AD3d 154
Frasier v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 154
Holding The court reversed the lower court’s stay and referral to the Public Service Commission, holding that the primary jurisdiction doctrine did not apply because the claims were common-law torts requiring judicial determination of duty and causation. The PSC’s regulatory standards set only a minimum safety floor and do not dispositive the specific duty of care regarding stray voltage’s impact on cattle.
The court’s words
compliance with regulatory standards is not dispositive as to due care
252 AD3d 154, at the official text
the duty of care with respect to stray voltage on dairy farms may be quite different from this regulatory floor
252 AD3d 154, at the official text
resolution of plaintiffs’ claims do not first require resolution of issues placed within the agency’s special competence
252 AD3d 154, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | February 26, 2026 |
| Citation | 252 AD3d 154 |
| Area of law | Administrative Law · Personal Injury and Negligence |
| Week | Week ending February 28, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 252 AD3d 154 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv41.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1312 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Frasier v Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., 252 AD3d 154 (Appellate Division, Third Department, February 26, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-154/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works