ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · March 31, 2026 · 252 AD3d 172

Matter of McMurdo

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 172

Holding The court granted the joint motion for discipline by consent and suspended respondent from the practice of law for one year, effective nunc pro tunc to September 20, 2024. The court found that a one-year suspension was appropriate given respondent’s violations of professional conduct rules related to issuing false opinion letters and his voluntary cessation of practice.

The court’s words

respondent observed inconsistencies and inaccuracies in various . . . disclosure reports that made him feel uncomfortable, yet he continued to issue and sign opinion letters

252 AD3d 172, at the official text

it is logical and jurisprudentially sound under these circumstances to accord weight to the sanction fashioned by the tribunal with regulatory authority

252 AD3d 172, at the official text

where an attorney voluntarily refrains from practice in anticipation of formal discipline, imposing a nunc pro tunc suspension is appropriate

252 AD3d 172, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedMarch 31, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 172
Area of lawAttorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility
WeekWeek ending April 4, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 172
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv41.pdf
Law Watch record id1305

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of McMurdo, 252 AD3d 172 (Appellate Division, First Department, March 31, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-172/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published March 31, 2026. Updated March 31, 2026.