Appellate Division, First Department · March 31, 2026 · 252 AD3d 172
Matter of McMurdo
Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 172
Holding The court granted the joint motion for discipline by consent and suspended respondent from the practice of law for one year, effective nunc pro tunc to September 20, 2024. The court found that a one-year suspension was appropriate given respondent’s violations of professional conduct rules related to issuing false opinion letters and his voluntary cessation of practice.
The court’s words
respondent observed inconsistencies and inaccuracies in various . . . disclosure reports that made him feel uncomfortable, yet he continued to issue and sign opinion letters
252 AD3d 172, at the official text
it is logical and jurisprudentially sound under these circumstances to accord weight to the sanction fashioned by the tribunal with regulatory authority
252 AD3d 172, at the official text
where an attorney voluntarily refrains from practice in anticipation of formal discipline, imposing a nunc pro tunc suspension is appropriate
252 AD3d 172, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | March 31, 2026 |
| Citation | 252 AD3d 172 |
| Area of law | Attorney Discipline and Professional Responsibility |
| Week | Week ending April 4, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 252 AD3d 172 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv41.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1305 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of McMurdo, 252 AD3d 172 (Appellate Division, First Department, March 31, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-172/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works