Appellate Division, Third Department · March 19, 2026 · 252 AD3d 235
Matter of Cannabis v Hochul
Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 235
Holding The court held that New York’s cannabis regulations under the Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act are not preempted by the federal Controlled Substances Act because they do not create a positive conflict or stand as an obstacle to federal objectives. The regulations merely regulate legitimate and illegitimate handling of marihuana without requiring conduct that violates federal law.
The court’s words
neither MRTA nor the challenged regulations pose any requirements on an individual or entity to manufacture, distribute or possess marihuana
252 AD3d 235, at the official text
the challenged regulations promulgated under MRTA represent an obstacle to the accomplishment of a fading federal objective
252 AD3d 235, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Third Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | March 19, 2026 |
| Citation | 252 AD3d 235 |
| Area of law | Civil Rights and Constitutional Law |
| Week | Week ending March 21, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 252 AD3d 235 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv43.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1695 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Cannabis v Hochul, 252 AD3d 235 (Appellate Division, Third Department, March 19, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-235/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works