ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Third Department · March 19, 2026 · 252 AD3d 235

Matter of Cannabis v Hochul

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 235

Holding The court held that New York’s cannabis regulations under the Marihuana Regulation and Taxation Act are not preempted by the federal Controlled Substances Act because they do not create a positive conflict or stand as an obstacle to federal objectives. The regulations merely regulate legitimate and illegitimate handling of marihuana without requiring conduct that violates federal law.

The court’s words

neither MRTA nor the challenged regulations pose any requirements on an individual or entity to manufacture, distribute or possess marihuana

252 AD3d 235, at the official text

the challenged regulations promulgated under MRTA represent an obstacle to the accomplishment of a fading federal objective

252 AD3d 235, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Third Department
DecidedMarch 19, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 235
Area of lawCivil Rights and Constitutional Law
WeekWeek ending March 21, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 235
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv43.pdf
Law Watch record id1695

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Cannabis v Hochul, 252 AD3d 235 (Appellate Division, Third Department, March 19, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-235/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published March 19, 2026. Updated March 19, 2026.