Supreme Court, Dutchess County · April 3, 2026 · 90 Misc 3d 234
Michaelis v Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB
Read the official decision: 90 Misc 3d 234
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Canonical coverage: the full case page for this decision is at Olympus Legal Systems.
ESQ HQ is published by the team behind Aletheia.
Read the canonical case page at Olympus Legal SystemsHolding The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for leave to renew and motion to vacate because she failed to provide a reasonable justification for not presenting the new evidence on prior motions. The court also noted that the plaintiff’s legal citations were largely hallucinated by generative artificial intelligence without proper review.
The court’s words
The majority of the legal cases proffered by Plaintiff appear to have been hallucinated through the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
90 Misc 3d 234, at the official text
A motion for leave to renew is not a second chance freely given to parties who have not exercised due diligence
90 Misc 3d 234, at the official text
Plaintiff's motion for leave to renew fails as she provides no reasonable justification for not presenting this newly discovered evidence
90 Misc 3d 234, at the official text
| Court | Supreme Court, Dutchess County |
|---|---|
| Decided | April 3, 2026 |
| Citation | 90 Misc 3d 234 |
| Area of law | Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending April 4, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 90 Misc 3d 234 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv41.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1310 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Michaelis v Wilmington Sav. Fund Socy., FSB, 90 Misc 3d 234 (Supreme Court, Dutchess County, April 3, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/90-misc-3d-234/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works