Supreme Court, Queens County · January 30, 2026 · 90 Misc 3d 321
People v Porter
Read the official decision: 90 Misc 3d 321
Holding The court granted the defendant’s motion to vacate his conviction and ordered a new trial, finding that the prosecution committed a Brady violation by suppressing material impeachment and exculpatory evidence. The suppressed evidence included documents showing the prosecutor’s intent to arrest a key witness as an accomplice and handwritten notes containing third-party guilt information.
The court’s words
the aggregate effect of the suppressed evidence in this case establishes a reasonable possibility that the outcome of defendant’s trial would have been different
90 Misc 3d 321, at the official text
the magnitude of the prosecutor’s combined suppression of Brady/Giglio evidence in this case clearly violated defendant’s constitutional right to due process
90 Misc 3d 321, at the official text
ADA Schaeffer admittedly abdicated his duty to seek the truth by failing to pursue an investigation into such clearly exculpatory information
90 Misc 3d 321, at the official text
Suppression of this material denied defendant the opportunity to explore the basis for the deponent’s conclusions before the jury
90 Misc 3d 321, at the official text
| Court | Supreme Court, Queens County |
|---|---|
| Decided | January 30, 2026 |
| Citation | 90 Misc 3d 321 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending January 31, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 90 Misc 3d 321 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv43.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 1688 |
| Related records | People v Porter, 2026 NY Slip Op 06459 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Porter, 90 Misc 3d 321 (Supreme Court, Queens County, January 30, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/90-misc-3d-321/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works