ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04679

People v Daniel M.-A.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04679

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The court affirmed the denial of the defendant’s application for resentencing under the DVSJA because he failed to establish a temporal nexus between his childhood abuse and the offense. Consequently, the failure to prove the first element of the statute automatically resulted in the failure of the second and third elements.

The court’s words

defendant failed to meet his burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that he was "a victim of substantial abuse during the years leading up to the [offense]"

2026 NY Slip Op 04679, at the official text

Where a defendant fails to establish their burden of proof as to the first element, the second and third elements fail automatically

2026 NY Slip Op 04679, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04679
Area of lawCriminal Law
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04679
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id539

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Daniel M.-A., 2026 NY Slip Op 04679 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04679/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.