ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04680

People v Kadenhead

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04680

Holding The court held that law enforcement officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant based on security footage and other circumstantial evidence, and that the arrest in a common hallway did not violate the Payton rule because the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in that area.

The court’s words

defendant was not arrested in his own apartment but in the common hallway of a [multi]-apartment building . . . and thus had no reasonable expectation of privacy

2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text

the police had knowledge that defendant [appeared to be] the last known person to see the victim alive when he [entered the apartment with the victim]

2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text

the foregoing facts, taken together, were sufficient to supply the requisite probable cause for defendant's de facto arrest

2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Fourth Department
DecidedJuly 24, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 04680
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending July 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04680
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id541

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Kadenhead, 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04680/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published July 24, 2026. Updated July 24, 2026.