Appellate Division, Fourth Department · July 24, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 04680
People v Kadenhead
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04680
Holding The court held that law enforcement officers had probable cause to arrest the defendant based on security footage and other circumstantial evidence, and that the arrest in a common hallway did not violate the Payton rule because the defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in that area.
The court’s words
defendant was not arrested in his own apartment but in the common hallway of a [multi]-apartment building . . . and thus had no reasonable expectation of privacy
2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text
the police had knowledge that defendant [appeared to be] the last known person to see the victim alive when he [entered the apartment with the victim]
2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text
the foregoing facts, taken together, were sufficient to supply the requisite probable cause for defendant's de facto arrest
2026 NY Slip Op 04680, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Fourth Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | July 24, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending July 25, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 541 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Kadenhead, 2026 NY Slip Op 04680 (Appellate Division, Fourth Department, July 24, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-04680/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works