Appellate Division, Second Department · September 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05198
People v Williams
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05198
Holding The court affirmed the convictions for assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, finding the evidence legally sufficient and not against the weight of the evidence. The court also held that the trial court properly disqualified defense counsel due to a potential conflict of interest and correctly limited the jury instruction to the justification of deadly physical force.
The court’s words
viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution
2026 NY Slip Op 05198, at the official text
doubts as to the existence of a conflict of interest are resolved in favor of disqualification
2026 NY Slip Op 05198, at the official text
the defendant's use of a sharp object to slash the victim's eye constituted deadly physical force
2026 NY Slip Op 05198, at the official text
the particular justification instruction given to the jury must be consistent with the facts
2026 NY Slip Op 05198, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05198 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending September 5, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05198 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 397 |
| Related records | People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06578; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06217; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06208; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06024; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 04653; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 04577 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 05198 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05198/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works