Appellate Division, First Department · October 15, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06024
People v Williams
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06024
Holding The court affirmed the conviction, noting that the defendant validly waived his right to appeal, which forecloses review of the suppression decision. Alternatively, the court held that the defendant lacked standing to challenge the search because he had no expectation of privacy in the apartment.
The court’s words
Defendant validly waived his right to appeal, which forecloses review of his challenge to the suppression decision
2026 NY Slip Op 06024, at the official text
Defendant lacked standing to challenge the law enforcement team's entry into the apartment where he was located
2026 NY Slip Op 06024, at the official text
Defendant did not have an expectation of privacy in the apartment since he had neither lived there nor stayed overnight
2026 NY Slip Op 06024, at the official text
the police justifiably relied on the apartment tenant's authority to consent to a search of her closet
2026 NY Slip Op 06024, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 15, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06024 |
| Area of law | Criminal Law |
| Week | Week ending October 17, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06024 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1283 |
| Related records | People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06578; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06217; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06208; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 05198; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 04653; People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 04577 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Williams, 2026 NY Slip Op 06024 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 15, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06024/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works