Appellate Division, Second Department · September 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05210
Vaynman v 3 Kings Point Realty, LLC
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05210
Holding The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal regarding the denial of reargument but modified the lower court’s order to grant the plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss the defendants’ second, third, and fifth counterclaims. The court found that the counterclaims for defamation, tortious interference, and common-law indemnification failed to meet the required pleading standards for specificity and factual allegations.
The court’s words
no appeal lies from an order denying reargument
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
commencing a civil action by summons and complaint is not process capable of being abused
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
the particular words complained of shall be set forth in the complaint
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
bare legal conclusions are not presumed to be true and are not accorded every favorable inference
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
an essential element of a cause of action sounding in common-law indemnification
2026 NY Slip Op 05210, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, Second Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | September 2, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05210 |
| Area of law | Personal Injury and Negligence · Civil Procedure |
| Week | Week ending September 5, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05210 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 422 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Vaynman v 3 Kings Point Realty, LLC, 2026 NY Slip Op 05210 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05210/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works