ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 2, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05211

Velasquez v Kelly

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05211

Holding The appellate court dismissed the third-party defendant’s appeal for lack of standing and modified the lower court’s order to vacate the conditional striking of the defendant’s answer. The court determined that the defendant complied with the discovery order by demonstrating the requested footage did not exist and that he had a potentially meritorious defense.

The court’s words

A person is aggrieved within the meaning of CPLR 5511 'when he or she asks for relief but that relief is denied in whole or in part'

2026 NY Slip Op 05211, at the official text

A party may not be compelled to produce or sanctioned for failing to produce information which he [or she] does not possess

2026 NY Slip Op 05211, at the official text

Kelly complied with the order dated July 23, 2024, by demonstrating that the additional video surveillance footage sought by the plaintiff did not exist

2026 NY Slip Op 05211, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 2, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05211
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 5, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05211
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id424

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Velasquez v Kelly, 2026 NY Slip Op 05211 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 2, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05211/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 2, 2026. Updated September 2, 2026.