ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 23, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05432

Rojas v Riverhead Cent. Sch. Dist.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05432

Holding The court affirmed summary judgment for the plaintiff on the Labor Law § 240(1) claim because the unsecured ladder shifted, causing the fall. The court also affirmed the denial of summary judgment for the school district on the contractual indemnification claim because it was not a party to the relevant agreement.

The court’s words

where a ladder slides, shifts, tips over, or otherwise collapses for no apparent reason, the plaintiff has established a violation

2026 NY Slip Op 05432, at the official text

Since RCSD was not a party to the agreement between Stalco and Dynasty or named as an indemnitee therein, RCSD is not entitled to contractual indemnification

2026 NY Slip Op 05432, at the official text

Dynasty would not be bound by an indemnification clause contained in the agreement between RCSD and Stalco

2026 NY Slip Op 05432, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 23, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05432
Area of lawPersonal Injury and Negligence · Labor Law and Construction Accidents
WeekWeek ending September 26, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05432
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id203

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Rojas v Riverhead Cent. Sch. Dist., 2026 NY Slip Op 05432 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 23, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05432/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 23, 2026. Updated September 23, 2026.