ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · September 23, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05433

Saintvilus v Hall

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05433

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s denial of the defendant’s motion for leave to renew his prior motion for summary judgment. The court determined that the defendant failed to proffer new facts or demonstrate a change in the law that would alter the prior determination.

The court’s words

A motion for leave to renew "shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination or shall demonstrate that there has been a change in the law that would change the prior determination"

2026 NY Slip Op 05433, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedSeptember 23, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05433
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending September 26, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05433
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id204

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Saintvilus v Hall, 2026 NY Slip Op 05433 (Appellate Division, Second Department, September 23, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05433/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published September 23, 2026. Updated September 23, 2026.