Appellate Division, First Department · October 1, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05598
Hakim v Hakim
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05598
Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of a counterclaim on a promissory note because it was based on past consideration without an explicit written recitation or valid antecedent obligation. Additionally, the court upheld the grant of an accounting for a partnership dissolution, noting that a fiduciary relationship exists between partners and an accounting is the proper method for winding up a partnership.
The court’s words
The trial court properly dismissed Kamran's fourth counterclaim against Said seeking recovery under the 1998 promissory note upon determining that it was improperly premised on past consideration.
2026 NY Slip Op 05598, at the official text
An allegation of wrongdoing is not an indispensable element of a demand for an accounting where the complaint indicates a fiduciary relationship between the parties
2026 NY Slip Op 05598, at the official text
the only manner in which a partnership can be wound up is through an accounting
2026 NY Slip Op 05598, at the official text
the conduct attributed to Said did not rise to the level of immoral, unconscionable conduct
2026 NY Slip Op 05598, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 1, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 05598 |
| Area of law | Contracts and Commercial · Corporate, Securities and Business |
| Week | Week ending October 3, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05598 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 760 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Hakim v Hakim, 2026 NY Slip Op 05598 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 1, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05598/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works