ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 1, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05599

Matter of Knights v City Univ. of N.Y.

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05599

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the petition because it was time-barred under the four-month statute of limitations. Additionally, the termination claims were barred by res judicata, and the decision not to interview the petitioner was not arbitrary or capricious.

The court’s words

Petitioner brought the proceeding well outside the four-month statute of limitations.

2026 NY Slip Op 05599, at the official text

the claims stemming from the 2017 termination are barred by the doctrine of res judicata

2026 NY Slip Op 05599, at the official text

it was neither arbitrary nor capricious

2026 NY Slip Op 05599, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 1, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05599
Area of lawAdministrative Law
WeekWeek ending October 3, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05599
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id762

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Knights v City Univ. of N.Y., 2026 NY Slip Op 05599 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 1, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05599/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 1, 2026. Updated October 1, 2026.