ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · October 14, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 05924

Alexim Holdings, LLC v Chang-Wardi

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05924

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim because a valid contract governed the subject matter, but reversed the denial of the motion to dismiss the injunctive relief claim. The court held that injunctive relief was inappropriate because the builder’s injury could be adequately compensated by money damages.

The court’s words

the existence of a valid contract governing the subject matter generally precludes recovery in quasi contract for events arising out of the same subject matter

2026 NY Slip Op 05924, at the official text

A permanent injunction is a drastic remedy which may be granted only where the plaintiff demonstrates that it will suffer irreparable harm absent the injunction

2026 NY Slip Op 05924, at the official text

where an injury can be adequately compensated by money damages, injunctive relief is inappropriate

2026 NY Slip Op 05924, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedOctober 14, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 05924
Area of lawLabor Law and Construction Accidents
WeekWeek ending October 17, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 05924
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1161

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Alexim Holdings, LLC v Chang-Wardi, 2026 NY Slip Op 05924 (Appellate Division, Second Department, October 14, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-05924/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 14, 2026. Updated October 14, 2026.