ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, First Department · October 22, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06230

Wilson Tang, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v Vincent Tang, Defendant-Appellant

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06230

Holding The Appellate Division affirmed the lower court’s finding of civil contempt, determining that the defendant failed to comply with a court order to add the plaintiff as an authorized representative on bank accounts and violated a settlement agreement by disparaging the plaintiff on social media.

The court’s words

Plaintiff demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that defendant did not comply with the court's order

2026 NY Slip Op 06230, at the official text

The finding of civil contempt is appropriate regardless of the contemnor's motive

2026 NY Slip Op 06230, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, First Department
DecidedOctober 22, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06230
Area of lawCivil Procedure
WeekWeek ending October 24, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06230
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1497

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Wilson Tang, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v Vincent Tang, Defendant-Appellant, 2026 NY Slip Op 06230 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 22, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06230/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published October 22, 2026. Updated October 22, 2026.