Appellate Division, First Department · October 22, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06231
Weiss v Salgado
Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06231
Holding The Appellate Division reversed the lower court’s denial of summary judgment, dismissing the complaint because the defendants met their prima facie burden of showing the treatment met the standard of care and the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff’s expert opinions were deemed unsupported or contradicted by the medical records regarding the use of intravenous lines and monitoring procedures.
The court’s words
defendants' treatment of plaintiff's decedent met the standard of good and accepted medical practice
2026 NY Slip Op 06231, at the official text
opinions of plaintiff's experts were in places unsupported or contradicted by the record
2026 NY Slip Op 06231, at the official text
records confirm that infusions were not performed while the decedent's blood pressure was being taken
2026 NY Slip Op 06231, at the official text
record shows that a physician examined the decedent's extremities approximately one hour before evidence of extravasation emerged
2026 NY Slip Op 06231, at the official text
| Court | Appellate Division, First Department |
|---|---|
| Decided | October 22, 2026 |
| Citation | 2026 NY Slip Op 06231 |
| Area of law | Medical Malpractice |
| Week | Week ending October 24, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06231 |
| Publication status | Slip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
| Source feed | New York slip opinion page |
| Law Watch record id | 1498 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Weiss v Salgado, 2026 NY Slip Op 06231 (Appellate Division, First Department, October 22, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06231/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works