ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Division, Second Department · November 4, 2026 · 2026 NY Slip Op 06481

U.S. Bank N.A. v Rahman

Read the official decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06481

Holding The court affirmed the dismissal of the foreclosure action as time-barred because the statute of limitations began running when the plaintiff accelerated the debt in a prior action. The court held that the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act prohibits a noteholder from unilaterally revoking a prior election to accelerate the debt.

The court’s words

the de-acceleration letter did not revoke the prior election to accelerate the debt

2026 NY Slip Op 06481, at the official text

a noteholder can no longer unilaterally revoke a prior election to accelerate the debt

2026 NY Slip Op 06481, at the official text

the plaintiff's arguments challenging FAPA's retroactive application and constitutionality are without merit

2026 NY Slip Op 06481, at the official text
CourtAppellate Division, Second Department
DecidedNovember 4, 2026
Citation2026 NY Slip Op 06481
Area of lawMortgage Foreclosure · Real Property
WeekWeek ending November 7, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 2026 NY Slip Op 06481
Publication statusSlip opinions are uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Source feedNew York slip opinion page
Law Watch record id1776

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, U.S. Bank N.A. v Rahman, 2026 NY Slip Op 06481 (Appellate Division, Second Department, November 4, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/2026-ny-slip-op-06481/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published November 4, 2026. Updated November 4, 2026.