ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Court of Appeals · April 21, 2026 · 252 AD3d 207

MATTER OF CITY OF NY v BALL

Read the official decision: 252 AD3d 207

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The Court of Appeals affirmed the Appellate Division’s reversal of the Supreme Court’s judgment, holding that the petitioner’s challenge to an alleged overassessment was reviewable exclusively under RPTL article 7. Consequently, the certified question was not answered as unnecessary.

The court’s words

petitioner’s application challenging the alleged overassessment of its property—resulting from the failure to apply an increase in the physical value of the property and an exemption following certain window replacement work—was reviewable exclusively under RPTL article 7

252 AD3d 207, at the official text
CourtCourt of Appeals
DecidedApril 21, 2026
Citation252 AD3d 207
Area of lawTax
WeekWeek ending April 25, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 252 AD3d 207
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv43.pdf
Law Watch record id1685

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, MATTER OF CITY OF NY v BALL, 252 AD3d 207 (Court of Appeals, April 21, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/252-ad3d-207/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published April 21, 2026. Updated April 21, 2026.