Court of Appeals · February 17, 2026 · 45 NY3d 659
PEOPLE v GUERRERO
Read the official decision: 45 NY3d 659
This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.
Holding The Youth Part did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s removal to Family Court because the totality of the circumstances, including his escalating criminal behavior despite five years of services, constituted extraordinary circumstances. The court affirmed that the statute grants judges broad discretion to make individualized determinations rather than applying a rigid two-part test.
The court’s words
The circumstances of this case could fairly be described as extraordinary.
45 NY3d 659, at the official text
The absence of such guidance evinces a legislative intent to leave the extraordinary circumstances determination within the broad discretion of the court.
45 NY3d 659, at the official text
This is not a case of mere reoffense but of chronic, repeated reoffense and escalating criminal behavior.
45 NY3d 659, at the official text
| Court | Court of Appeals |
|---|---|
| Decided | February 17, 2026 |
| Citation | 45 NY3d 659 |
| Area of law | Criminal Procedure |
| Week | Week ending February 21, 2026 |
| Official text | Official decision: 45 NY3d 659 |
| Source feed | New York advance sheet: 26nyadv38.pdf |
| Law Watch record id | 99 |
Recommended citation
ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, PEOPLE v GUERRERO, 45 NY3d 659 (Court of Appeals, February 17, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/45-ny3d-659/
How this record was made
Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.
Read how Law Watch works