ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Court of Appeals · February 19, 2026 · 45 NY3d 677

Matter of Russell v Town of Mount Pleasant

Read the official decision: 45 NY3d 677

This record is held from search listings because it does not meet the site’s substance floor; the official text is linked below.

Holding The Town properly denied the FOIL request because the privacy interests in keeping subscriber names and email addresses confidential outweighed any public interest in disclosure. The court determined that disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy due to significant cybersecurity risks and the lack of public benefit.

The court’s words

The Town established that the privacy interests in keeping the information confidential are weighty, and that disclosure of the requested records would serve no public interest.

45 NY3d 677, at the official text

The balancing of the interests at issue here lands squarely in favor of the subscribers’ privacy interests.

45 NY3d 677, at the official text

The Town’s assertions regarding the potential risks to E-news subscribers whose names and email addresses are disclosed were not speculative.

45 NY3d 677, at the official text
CourtCourt of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 2026
Citation45 NY3d 677
Area of lawFreedom of Information Law
WeekWeek ending February 21, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 45 NY3d 677
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv38.pdf
Law Watch record id100
Caption in the source feedRUSSELL v TOWN

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, Matter of Russell v Town of Mount Pleasant, 45 NY3d 677 (Court of Appeals, February 19, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/45-ny3d-677/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published February 19, 2026. Updated November 14, 2026.