ESQ HQNEW YORK LAW WATCH

Appellate Term, Second Department · March 20, 2026 · 89 Misc 3d 5

People v Bergman

Read the official decision: 89 Misc 3d 5

Holding The court affirmed the conviction, holding that the People satisfied their due diligence obligations under CPL 245.20 by providing sufficient disclosure letters regarding police officer misconduct. Additionally, the court found that the People validly stated ready within the statutory 90-day period, as the speedy trial clock was tolled by executive orders until October 4, 2020.

The court’s words

the People adequately disclosed, prior to their filing of the December 30, 2020 COC, that there were no misconduct allegations

89 Misc 3d 5, at the official text

the People satisfied their obligation of due diligence when they filed their December 30, 2020 COC

89 Misc 3d 5, at the official text

the People validly stated ready on December 30, 2020, which was less than 90 days after the speedy trial clock began to run

89 Misc 3d 5, at the official text
CourtAppellate Term, Second Department
DecidedMarch 20, 2026
Citation89 Misc 3d 5
Area of lawCriminal Procedure
WeekWeek ending March 21, 2026
Official textOfficial decision: 89 Misc 3d 5
Source feedNew York advance sheet: 26nyadv39.pdf
Law Watch record id796

Recommended citation

ESQ HQ, New York Law Watch, People v Bergman, 89 Misc 3d 5 (Appellate Term, Second Department, March 20, 2026), https://esqhq.com/decisions/89-misc-3d-5/

How this record was made

Holding drafted by Law Watch’s in-house model, graded by three reviewers; every quotation verified word for word against the official text.

Read how Law Watch works

Published March 20, 2026. Updated March 20, 2026.