Hernandez v Lakeview Arms Apts.

Holding The Appellate Term affirmed the dismissal of the small claims action, finding that substantial justice was done because the tenant admitted to causing damage beyond ordinary wear and tear. The court held that the property manager’s credible testimony regarding repair costs was sufficient to justify retaining the security deposit, even without itemized bills, given the small amount involved.

The court’s words

the Justice Court rationally credited the property manager's testimony that the "reasonable value" of the cost of these repairs exceeded the amount of the security deposit

2026 NY Slip Op 51289[U], at the official text

the submission of documentation to establish the exact cost of these repairs was unnecessary in light of the property manager's credible testimony and the amounts involved

2026 NY Slip Op 51289[U], at the official text

our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law"

2026 NY Slip Op 51289[U], at the official text